Page 113 - Demo
P. 113
112Interesting facts about enforcement of civil case judgment%u0009 a.Inthecasethattheenforcementofficerhasalreadyorderedattachment of the debtor%u2019s salary in excess of 20,000 baht. The remaining amountof20,000bahtisdeemedbytheenforcementofficertobethedebtor%u2019s subsistence allowance. Therefore, the creditor in other cases cannot asktheenforcementofficertoattachthis20,000bahtsubsistencealllowancebecause it is not liable to execution. %u0009 b.%u0009 Inthecasethattheenforcementofficerreducestheoriginalamountofattachmentto50percent,itisbecausetheenforcementofficerdeemsthat the subsistence circumstances of the debtor has changed. Therefore, a reduction to 50 percent of the original attached amount is not liable to attachment.c. In such case, it is the Legal Execution Department%u2019s salary attachmentpractice to take the debtor%u2019s subsistence circumstances into consideration and leave an amount of no less than 20,000 baht for this purpose. If the creditorinthefirstcasehasnotaskedtheenforcementofficertoattachthefull amount of income in excess of 20,000 baht, the creditor in subsequent cases can request for attachment of such amount. In the case that an enforcement officer has ordered attachment of the debtor%u2019s salary by leaving the remaining amount of no less than 20,000 baht, a.can a creditor in another case request further attachment and for how much?b.if the debtor later requests a reduction in the salary attachment to 50 percent and the enforcement officer has ordered such reduction, can the creditor in another case request attachment of such reduction in the salary attachment?c.on the contrary, if the creditor in the first case asks the enforcementofficer to attach only 50 percent of the salary, can the creditor in another case ask the enforcement officer to attach the other 50 percent of the salary which has not been attached?No.13QuestionAnswer

